Thursday, July 18, 2024

 

Link for My Latest Published Article on “Invasive" Plants


When people like nonnative plants, they don’t complain about how far and wide they spread. At a facility near the University of Virginia in Charlottesville, alien crocuses have spread throughout the lawn over the course of decades. Would anyone ever refer to these flowers as “invasive”? Probably not, because they create such a lovely sight. 


ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS  © Marlene A. Condon

 

On July 12, 2024, The Daily Progress (the daily newspaper of Charlottesville, VA) published my article regarding the value to wildlife of so-called invasive species, such as the Mimosa-tree (Albizia julibrissin). You can find it at the link below, where half a dozen photos make clear the reason for the spread of naturalized plants (now usually referred to as “invasive”) as well as provide examples of some of the wildlife that makes extensive use of the alien Mimosa.

  

https://dailyprogress.com/opinion/column/marlene-a-condon-theyre-not-invasive-species-theyre-naturalized/article_d65069bc-4031-11ef-b27f-3774d5c1dde3.html

 

If you can’t access my article at this site, I am reproducing it below for your convenience.

 

Sincerely,

Marlene


Exotic Mimosa-tree Provides Food and Beauty

 

You’ve probably noticed the tropical-looking trees with gorgeous pink puffs of flowers that are currently blooming around the area. Known as the Silktree (or Silk Tree), Mimosa-tree, or just Mimosa (Albizia julibrissin), it presents a sight that most folks enjoy viewing, but others do not because they consider this nonnative tree “invasive”. But is it? Not at all; it’s “naturalized”.


Untended areas, such as the one in this photo, serve as important food sources for our native wildlife trying to eke out a living in urban areas. Here, a blooming Mimosa-tree helps to ameliorate the pollinator food-desert resulting from the nearby native trees having long since flowered. 


The lovely blooms and fern-like leaves of the tropical-looking Mimosa-tree provide landscape color at a time of year when it’s hard to find a native tree blooming.


If you’re a gardener who has lived long enough, you’ll recall that decades ago, plants that became established and survived on their own, able to spread in a region where they were not indigenous, were considered wonderful additions to the landscape. You got more plants for free and more beauty to savor in your surroundings.

 

Even today, some plant catalogs tout naturalizing: “For a carefree, colourful display year after year, let your bulbs go wild! Flowering bulbs will keep your garden ablaze with colour when other plants are just emerging or have faded. Naturalizing is the process of imitating nature with bulb plantings.”

 

https://www.brecks.com/how_to_landscaping_with_bulbs_naturalizing

 

Note the final sentence that imparts the wisdom that “naturalizing is the process of imitating nature”. This statement reveals recognition of the fact that plants spread when conditions suit them in the natural world. In other words, what folks today refer to as invasiveness is a misreading of a natural process that is neither mysterious nor mystical, nor hard to understand.

 

Old books don’t complain about “invasiveness”; to the contrary, they treat naturalization as the normal—and often desired—outcome it is for some alien-plant species.

 

My 1988 Peterson Field Guide to Trees tells the reader that Mimosa is “[n]ative to S[outh] Asia but widely planted and naturalized in the eastern U.S.” My 1983 Illustrated Book of Trees informs us that “[the Silktree] has become extensively naturalized from Virginia southward and often grows by the wayside.”

 

The latter book points out that Mimosa “is able to thrive on even the poorer soils”. My 1980 book, The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees, concurs. It tells us this tree occurs in “[o]pen areas including wasteland and dry gravelly soils.” And the 1981 University Press of Virginia book, Trees and Shrubs of Virginia, adds “[w]ood borders, clearings, [and] roadsides”.

 

What do each of these locations have in common? Every single one of them results from people having impacted the soil at some point in a site’s history. Otherwise, the area would be filled with old-growth trees, the original landscape of eastern North America.

 

A 1998 Timber Press book, Trees of the Central Hardwood Forests, makes the mistake of telling the reader that the value of Mimosa is “[n]ot significant to any native wildlife species”. Indeed, this declaration has been much used by people, such as activist-entomologist Doug Tallamy, to disparage plants they view as alien invasives in need of removal. But I must beg to differ.

 

In 2019, I had the opportunity to document the life in the canopy (the upper layer of a mature tree) of a Mimosa. I had noticed this plant growing alongside a bridge I have crossed numerous times while exercising. As Mimosas are fast-growing trees, it didn’t take many years for this one to get large enough to bloom at the level of the bridge where I could observe the goings-on.


A day-flying Hummingbird Clearwing moth(Hemaris thysbe) is happy to feed upon nectar from a Mimosa-tree bloom.


In addition to this Spicebush Swallowtail butterfly (Papillo Troilus), you could see a Tiger Swallowtail (Papillo glaucus) and Silver-spotted Skipper (Epargyreus clarus), as well as small bees, obtaining nectar from Mimosa-tree blooms.



This large, healthy caterpillar was probably close to pupating after feeding upon the leaves (still closed here in early morning) of this nonnative Mimosa-tree.



Hummingbirds, small bees, several species of butterflies, a day-flying moth, and even caterpillars were getting food, courtesy of this foreign tree. Obviously, these animals could get food from native plants, if the appropriate plants existed nearby—and there’s the catch.

 

People seem to think “invasive” plants have stolen space from native plants that could be growing there, but most native plants can’t survive in the degraded soil where you typically find the nonnative plants designated as “invasive”.

 

I’ve found that what’s true for the Mimosa is also true of the many other so-called invasive plants that I’ve studied. The wildlife value of these plants is, without a doubt, certainly of significance when you consider that we are living in a world where development—that robs wildlife of habitat and destroys the soil profile for most native plants—never seems to end.


When people come upon “invasive” plants filling an area, they don’t consider its prior history of native-plant removal and soil damage that inevitably invited alien plants to grow there. The notion of “invasiveness” developed out of context to this bigger picture; without taking the whole story (i.e., background) into account, it’s easy to misinterpret the result.

Additional attributes of the so-called invasive plants—including Mimosa—is that they can withstand drought and often are tolerant of pollution, whether it be in the air or the soil.

 

Thanks to climate change, drought has become a more-frequent occurrence that can kill plants. (Along the river near where I live, some species of large trees are seriously suffering right now, even some located within the river!) Without drought-tolerant “invasive” plants, there could come a time when little habitat will exist. All plants, native or not, provide a living space for wildlife in some way.     

 

In a 1989 conversation with PBS journalist Bill Moyers, the novelist E. L. Doctorow, said, “When ideas go unexamined and unchallenged for a long enough time, they become mythological and very, very powerful. They create conformity. They intimidate.” His comments apply well to the “invasive”-plant narrative.

 

Orville Wright pointed out that, “If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance.”  I would adjust this truism to read that, “If we all work on the assumption that what is accepted as true about invasive plants is really true, there is little hope of conserving our wildlife.”

 

DISCLAIMER:

 

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 

 


Friday, June 14, 2024

 

Links to Three Articles Recently Published in Newspapers

  

Monarch nectaring at potted Lantana in author's yard.


ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © Marlene A. Condon

  

On April 17, 2024, The Daily Progress (the Charlottesville daily newspaper) published my article regarding the clearing of land along the Rivanna River by the parks department so their folks could get rid of so-called invasive plants. They replaced the nonnative trees and vines with tree saplings planted in neat rows, as if they were creating a tree farm instead of useful-to-wildlife habitat.

 

I feel that in a world with precious-little room left for wildlife, the destruction of functioning habitat to create what some people nowadays consider “ideal” habitat is a mistake. It robs wildlife of yet one more area to use NOW, as if these critters can afford to wait ten years or more for this area to possibly once again support them. You can read my commentary by using this link:

 

https://dailyprogress.com/opinion/column/marlene-a-condon-charlottesville-is-ripping-up-acres-of-plants-its-intentions-are-good-but/article_f755845c-fc8f-11ee-bbba-3fcd236be9a7.html

  

On May 27, 2024, The Daily Progress published my second article based upon the over-100-years-old book of bird lists I received from a reader. [You can find the first article link at In Defense of Nature: 2023]

 

I believe this little book makes clear why our wildlife is disappearing. You can read my article at The Daily Progress by using this link:

 

https://dailyprogress.com/opinion/column/marlene-a-condon-a-century-old-book-of-charlottesville-birds-provides-an-answer-to-the/article_6a464dc4-1b0e-11ef-8571-0321072d43b2.html


The article can also be accessed at The News Virginian that published it on May 29, 2024. Here’s the link:

 

https://newsvirginian.com/news/state-regional/marlene-a-condon-a-century-old-book-of-charlottesville-birds-provides-an-answer-to-the/article_ea177999-52d5-564f-9a41-444108e75c56.html

  

On June 13,2024, The Daily Progress published my article on the steep decline of Monarch butterfly populations, the migration of which may now be in peril. You can find it here:

 

https://dailyprogress.com/opinion/column/marlene-a-condon-the-monarch-butterflys-reign-may-be-at-an-end-and-were-to/article_32adeb76-28c7-11ef-ba09-43e76fdae454.html

 

You can also find this article at the Waynesboro daily newspaper, The News Virginian, that published the Monarch article June 14, 2024. Here’s the link:

 

https://newsvirginian.com/news/community/marlene-a-condon-the-monarch-butterflys-reign-may-be-at-an-end-and-were-to/article_7505e38d-cc25-5925-aaef-552a8fd5a69b.html#tracking-source=home-top-story

  

Sincerely,

Marlene


DISCLAIMER:

 

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 

 

Thursday, May 23, 2024

 Virginia Department of Forestry Has Made a Huge Mistake Removing Bradford Pear Trees


You need to place your nose right up to a Bradford Pear flower to smell it. It doesn’t perfume the air; if it did, no one would keep it long enough to grow large.


ALL TEXT © Marlene A. Condon


The Virginia Department of Forestry has committed a grievous error by encouraging folks to get rid of their Bradford Pear trees. The blooms of this cultivar feed uncountable numbers of pollinators in early spring when few other plants are blooming. Its fruits feed birds, such as waxwings and robins, in winter—the toughest time of year for them.

 

When Bradford Pears come up in degraded areas, such as roadsides, where the soil has been compacted and is nutrient-poor, they add value to the landscape by increasing the diversity of plant life and thus animal life. This tree is not “detrimental to the state’s environment” because it might not feed as many caterpillar species as a native tree. All plants cannot be all things to all animals. What matters is that they do support wildlife, be it by providing food, shelter, and/or nesting sites.

 

Environmentalists and government agencies have embraced the false narrative of “invasive” plants being to blame for our disappearing insects and birds because these plants don’t have a constituency that will fight tooth and nail against them. It’s easier to get folks to pull plants than to, say, get many cat lovers to keep their pets inside.

 

The American Bird Conservancy has been talking for decades about the 2.4 billion birds killed every year by cats. Can anyone really believe that alien plants pose more of a threat to birds than cats do? Yet government doesn’t regulate these felines as it should. https://abcbirds.org/program/cats-indoors/cats-and-birds/

 

The dearth of caterpillars is not due to an abundance of alien trees, but rather an abundance of far too many lights at night. Moths are attracted to lights where they are more easily predated by night-flying predators, such as bats and owls, which I watched happen every summer for years in Shenandoah National Park. And moths aren’t procreating if they’re spending the night at light fixtures that are left burning all night at people’s homes and businesses. 

 

You know an environmental narrative doesn’t carry much weight when the people pushing it need to resort to such silliness as how bad the blooms smell or how easily the plant breaks. This big stink about Bradford Pear trees is a solution in search of a problem.


 NATURE ADVICE:


If you like your Bradford Pear trees, keep them. Despite what government agencies, such as the Virginia Department of Forestry, may tell you, these trees DO feed and shelter wildlife. And that truth is what counts.

 

DISCLAIMER:

 

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 

 



Monday, September 25, 2023


UVa’s Forgotten Pond a Reminder We Should Protect Nature


Lewis Mountain and the future Alumni Hall can be seen across University Pond in this turn-of-the-century photo from the Corks and Curls Alumni Yearbook, 1919.

An 1895 map of the University of Virginia shows the marsh (see arrow) where John Bowie Fernyhough and his birding companions regularly viewed Marsh Wrens. Courtesy of  https://www.jarretthousenorth.com/2014/06/26/1895-map-of-the-university-of-virginia-grounds/





ALL TEXT © Marlene A. Condon


In 1929, a letter written on Lynchburg (Virginia) College stationery was sent to people known to be quite interested in birds. The letter was to find out if folks would be interested in forming "an ornithological organization for the State of Virginia".

 

John Bowie Ferneyhough was one of these people, and he went on to become a charter member of the Virginia Society of Ornithology. Mr. Ferneyhough's handwritten book of lists made on bird walks around UVA and the immediate vicinity in the early 1900s was passed along to me by his great-nephew, Waller Wilson, of Front Royal, Virginia.

  

The first of what I plan to be several articles on the amazing information I've discovered via research based upon Mr. Ferneyhough's book has been published in The News-Virginian, the daily newspaper of Waynesboro. If you are interested, you can find it here:

 

https://newsvirginian.com/opinion/column/condon-uvas-forgotten-pond-a-reminder-we-should-protect-nature/article_d3b2360e-591e-11ee-8a3c-3b30f1ceadd1.html

 

Sincerely,

Marlene

 


 


Friday, September 1, 2023

[Is It Time to Halt Bird Banding?] published as “Bird-banding has failed to stem the tide of decreasing bird numbers”: A Letter to the Editor, Hudson Valley One, published August 30, 2023

 https://hudsonvalleyone.com/2023/08/30/policing-lawyering-up-winston-farm-and-more-letters-from-our-readers/


In a study published in 2014, researchers tracked Tree Swallows crossing the Gulf of Mexico from Louisiana south to their wintering grounds in the Yucatan Peninsula. They found that “although most days during autumn migration were characterized by unfavorable headwinds blowing to the northwest, migration over the Gulf mostly occurred on days with strong winds blowing to the south.” This bit of information is telling: It verifies that the energy requirements for traveling across a large body of water are so high that birds wait for strong southward winds to help carry them across. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/60.5.653



ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © Marlene A. Condon


Bird banding has been done for so long that bird researchers and watchers typically don’t give it much thought. Perhaps they should.

 

I visited a bird banding station once, and when I saw the intense fear in the eyes of the birds being handled, I had to leave and never wanted to revisit the experience.

 

Am I motivated by emotion when I call for an end to this practice? Absolutely! But there’s plenty of emotionless rationale behind my contention that banding should be discontinued, and it’s based upon physics, biology, logic, and empathy.

 

Physics (the science of the relationship between matter and energy) dictates that increasing the amount of mass to be carried over miles requires increased energy stores to carry it.

 

Logic (the science that deals with the principles of valid reasoning) thus suggests that banding must be detrimental. A migrant has evolved to add just enough fat to its body to provide the energy needed to carry its average weight across the Gulf of Mexico. Adding a band—which increases mass to be carried—means a songbird’s energy will be exhausted sooner. Even if a bird’s energy is not depleted until it is as close as a few inches from land, the result is disastrous because the creature will drown if it falls into the water. Songbirds don’t swim.

 

Empathy (the ability to identify with and understand another’s situation and feelings) tells you that birds are terrified when handled by humans who are their natural enemies (some humans, including scientists, still kill birds).

 

Bird-banding science began in America over 100 years ago. As a tool for preservation, it has obviously failed to stem the tide of decreasing bird numbers. Hence, there’s no reason to add insult to injury; these animals are struggling enough to survive in a degraded world. 

 

NATURE ADVICE:

 

Scientists diss the emotion I’ve acknowledged here as part of my motivation for calling for an end to the practice of bird banding. When they criticize someone’s sensitivity in this particular scenario, however, they are suggesting everyone should just ignore the trauma that banders induce in the animals they profess to care about. But banders are inflicting severe stress, which is just as detrimental to birds as it is to people. There’s no shame in experiencing a conscious mental reaction to the expression of dread obvious in the eyes of animals being handled by humans, so don’t let scientists intimidate you with such cheap shots. It doesn't speak well of them to try to stop folks from speaking out by putting them down for caring justifiably about wildlife.

 

DISCLAIMER:

 

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 

 


Thursday, July 27, 2023

 

Two Articles Well Worth Reading


From the Conservation Sense and Nonsense website:

 “We use scientific studies and observation to explain why native plant ‘restorations’ in California are rarely successful.”

  

From Marlene: Although the primary focus of the Conservation Sense and Nonsense website is on the [mis]handling of so-called invasive plants in California, many articles are presented that take a wider view. I’m presenting here two links for articles that are well worth reading, no matter where you live.

 

The first article— “Talking back to nativism” —employs quotes from three authors who represent just a few of the many skeptics of “invasion” biology: Marlene A. Condon, author of this site (In Defense of Nature), Carol Reese (a retired horticultural extension agent in Tennessee), and the webmaster/author of the Conservation Sense and Nonsense website referenced above. This article includes excerpts from Dana Milbank’s Washington Post column of April 7, 2023, accompanied by commentary by the three skeptics.

 

https://milliontrees.me/2023/06/01/talking-back-to-nativism/

 

The second article— “Dana Milbank: ‘How I learned to love toxic chemicals’” —is written solely by the webmaster/author of the Conservation Sense and Nonsense website and is extremely well done. I highly recommend it. The reference is to the Dana Milbank Washington Post article of June 30, 2023.

 

https://milliontrees.me/2023/07/10/dana-milbank-how-i-learned-to-love-toxic-chemicals/

 

Ever so sincerely, Marlene

 

 CONDON'S CORNER Everyone Should Have A Mimosa Tree © Marlene A. Condon 2026 All Rights Reserved      [Published July 28, 2026, by The D...