Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts

Saturday, November 16, 2024

PART ELEVEN



Listing of Scientific Names of Organisms Mentioned in the Text

ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © 2024 Marlene A. Condon


Sachem butterfly at Lantana in the author's yard.

ANIMAL

INSECT

Ant—Family Formicidae

Damselfly, Aurora—Chromagrion conditum

Beetle, Red Milkweed—Tetraopes tetroph

Bug, Large Milkweed—Oncopeltus fasciatus

Butterfly, Monarch—Danaus plexippus

Butterfly, Sachem Skipper—Atalopedes campestris

Butterfly, Variegated Fritillary—Euptoieta claudia

MAMMAL

Ass (Donkey)—Equus africanus asinus

Bear, American Black—Ursus americanus

Cougar—Puma concolor

Cow—Bos taurus; Ox—usually, a castrated adult bull (Bos taurus)

Deer—Family Cervidae; Deer, White-tailed—Odocoileus virginianus; Elk—Cervus canadensis; Moose—Alces americanus

Dog—Canis lupus familiaris

Lion—Panthera leo

Man—Homo sapiens

Raccoon, Common—Procyon lotor

Sheep—Ovis aries

Tiger—Panthera tigris

Wolf—Family Canidae

MARINE

Oyster—Family Ostreidae

REPTILE

Black (or Eastern) Rat Snake—Elaphe obsoleta obsolete

PLANT

Black Knapweed—Centaurea nigra

Daylily—Hemerocallis spp.

Fleabane, Common—Erigeron philadelphicus

Fleabane, Daisy—Erigeron annuus

Lantana—Lantana camerata

Lily, Easter—Lilium longiflorum

Milkweed, Common—Asclepias syriaca

Rose, Cultivated—Family Rosaceae

Strawberry, Domestic—hybrid between Fragaria virginiana and Fragaria chiloensis, two different species native to the Americas

Violet, Common—Viola sororia



The Nature Revelation: God Exists

The Bible Declares It; Evolution Confirms It

© 2024 Marlene A. Condon

THE END


DISCLAIMER:

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 

Friday, November 15, 2024

PART NINE 

[Published January 11, 2025, by The Daily Progress, the daily newspaper of Charlottesville, Virginia]

[Published January 14, 2025, by The News Virginian, the daily newspaper of Waynesboro, Virginia]

Final Thoughts: Overpopulation of Man a Damning Problem for Eden

ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © 2024 Marlene A. Condon


In the 21st century, the population of the Monarch Butterfly dropped drastically, thanks in large part to the loss of Common Milkweed, its most important food source. Farming, with its use of pesticides, and development of land, along with a growing societal intolerance of “weeds”, denied Monarchs the chance to perpetuate their species.



You now know that the Bible tells us that all creatures were to go forth and multiply (Chapter One) so that the Earth—unique in all the universe, as far as we know—could then function in a self-sustaining manner for man and all of God’s other creatures.

 

Because the planet was mostly uninhabited, there was plenty of space for all life forms, including man, to fill at that time. But even then, for this system to work properly, populations of every creature had to be kept limited in number relative to each other, which is why a system of checks and balances existed, even for humans.

 

Before modern medicine came along, injuries and diseases shortened the life spans of both children and adults, and giving birth was fraught with peril for women. But once man figured out how to rather successfully get around these limiting factors, the Earth began to become overwhelmed by his numbers. Many circumstances nowadays point to the validity of this statement, such as the extinction of other life forms as humans have taken over their space, and the pollution of land, sea, and air as too many people live their lives.

 

Perhaps a more obvious proof is the depletion of natural foodstuffs, bringing about the need to create artificial ones, such as imitation vanilla, imitation crab, and imitation shrimp. Most telling of all is the talk of now using insects as an animal protein source.

    

The Earth is in a state of rapidly failing health, and is moving inexorably to the point of no longer being able to provide the essentials necessary for our existence. We would be wise to heed a quote from Lao Tzu, an ancient Chinese philosopher and writer, who warns us, “If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading.” Do we really want to continue upon our current path that will inevitably lead us to the end of the road for mankind?

[https://www.learnreligions.com/laozi-the-founder-of-taoism-3182933]

 

It's easy enough to comprehend the “prescription” that has come to us from the Bible for how man is to survive upon the Earth because it’s so logical. God does not just expect humans to coexist with other organisms upon the Earth; He demands it.  Like it or not, we cannot change how His system works, which tells us that an overpopulation of humans is a damning problem for the Earth (Eden)—and ultimately, us.



As more and more land becomes covered in buildings and pavement, less and less land is available for wildlife habitat. The children’s book, What Did the Tree See? (written by Charlotte Guillain and illustrated by Sam Usher [Wellbeck Editions, London 2020]), brilliantly brings home this fact in words and pictures: “I [the oak tree] looked at the sky as planes roared overhead, the hedgerows were gone and the meadows were dead. But still children came and they sat in my shade, they climbed on my branches and happily played.” 



 TOMORROW, PART TEN:

ADDENDUM—A Basic Explanation of Evolution 


DISCLAIMER:

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 

Monday, November 11, 2024

PART FIVE

[First half published January 4, 2025, and second half published January 7, 2025, by The Daily Progress, the daily newspaper of Charlottesville, Virginia]

Chapter Three: Other Religions Agree with the Nature Revelation

ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © 2024 Marlene A. Condon


In Hinduism, believers see God in all of creation, and thus consider every animal, even a snake (such as this Black Rat Snake), as sacred.


By way of the Bible, I have shown that nature is a gift from God to humanity, which people are supposed to care for properly, not only out of respect for God’s property, but also for their own welfare. Additionally, I employed the Bible to show that nature proves the existence of God. I made extensive use of the Bible because it contains the Word of God in the Christian and Jewish faiths, the two religions with which I am most familiar.

 

However, I would be remiss if I did not discuss, to some extent, Islam and Hinduism—the two religions that, along with Christianity, comprise almost 70% of religious adherents in the world. If God truly exists, and He expects people to take care of His creation (the natural world), then we should find the same proof of these truths in the holy books that are akin to the Bible for each religion.

 

(It is not necessary for the purposes of this treatise to consider the remaining 30% of people who are either nonreligious or whose religious affiliations comprise several different religions.)

 

Those who practice Islam (“submission to the will of God”) worship the same God (“Allah”) as does a Christian and a Jew. However, to a Moslem (the word means “one who submits”), God’s word was incompletely expressed in the earlier scriptures of the Bible and fulfilled only by the Koran (or Qur’an, the Romanized form of Quran, “the reading” or “the recitation”).

 

The Koran, then, is the one sacred scripture of Islam. It consists of writings that convey revelations from God, delivered to Mohammed by the angel, Gabriel. However, Mohammed (unlike Jesus) claimed no divinity, insisting that he was only a man chosen to be the spokesman of God.

 

Like the Bible, the Koran discusses nature, which should not be surprising. It was written later than the Bible, in 609 AD (“Anno Domini”, “in the year of our Lord”, referring to the year of Christ’s birth) or CE (“Common Era”, referring to the date in the most commonly used calendar system, the Gregorian). Mohammed was not only familiar with the Scriptures of the Jews and the Christians, he testified to the truthfulness of them.

 

The Koran mentions nature numerous times, but there is no need to go into the amount of detail that I went into for the Bible. Verse 164 from the second Surah (chapter) entitled, “The Cow”, conveys the essence of Romans 1:19-20 (from the Bible) that nature (the creation) proves God’s existence, which supports my thesis.

 

Romans 1:19-20:

For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made.

 

Surah 2:164:

(To guide) those who use their reason (to this Truth [of Allah’s sovereignty]) there are many Signs in the structure of the heavens and the earth, in the constant alternation of night and day, in the vessels which speed across the sea carrying goods that are of profit to people, in the water which Allah sends down from the sky and thereby quickens the earth after it was dead, and disperse over it all manner of animals, and in the changing courses of the winds and the clouds pressed into service between heaven and earth.

 

Surah 2:162:

If a man were to observe the constant operation of this universe, reflect on it in a manner befitting a rational being, and think about it without either stubbornness or bias, he would find sufficient signs to convince him that this gigantic system is absolutely subservient to the will of the Omnipotent and Wise Being, Who alone wields all power and authority.

[http://islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=2&verse=164&to=167]

 

Of course, the many signs [of Allah’s sovereignty] for those who “use their reason” are only discernible to those who possess an accurate knowledge of how the natural world works and how it relates to the lives of humans. As specified in Surah 162, people “must reflect on [the constant operation of this universe] in a manner befitting a rational being, and think about it without either stubbornness or bias”. In other words, only those who observe objectively (without personal feelings or opinions) the workings of nature can recognize the natural order of life and the usefulness (value) to their own existence of everything that surrounds them. This knowledge in particular points the way to the definitive proof of God’s existence, as revealed in Chapter Two.

 

Also mentioned in the Koran, just as in the Bible, Allah made the Sun and the Moon, the entire celestial sky, all beings on the earth, the day and the night, the rivers, and whatever is in the earth “subjected” to man. As with the Bible, the meaning in the original language of the Koran (Classical Arabic, “tasxir”—“subjection”) implies that these things exist alongside humans to sustain them. Humans were not to utilize them as if man owned and could do with them whatsoever he wished.

[https://www.al-islam.org/enlightening-commentary-light-holy-quran-vol-8/section-1-signs-allah-nature]

 

As pointed out in Surah 162: “Moreover, this system seems to be such as to rule out all possibility of any interference from others whether independent of the Creator of the universe or in partnership with Him. Since this One True God is the Lord of all creation and none else is in possession of any power or authority, none is entitled to any share in His godhead or overlordship [emphasis mine]”.

[http://islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=2&verse=164&to=167]

 

Nowadays, many people often misinterpret the word, “dominion”, in the Bible, to mean they do have the authority to treat the Earth howsoever they wish. Yet such an interpretation of the Bible or the Koran is senseless; God would never suggest that people take actions that would destroy the environment He created especially to feed, clothe, and shelter them.

 

Nor does it make sense that God would allow the suffering of creatures at the hands of man. What kind of example would that set for the way people should behave? It is well known that people who mistreat animals are highly likely to mistreat their fellow human beings.

 

As humanitarian Dr. Albert Schweitzer wrote, “Anyone who has accustomed himself to regard the life of any living creature as worthless is in danger of arriving also at the idea of worthless human lives.” Robert K. Resslar, an FBI agent and author who developed psychological profiles of serial killers, wrote that “Murderers…very often start out by killing and torturing animals as kids.”

[http://www.mass.gov/eopss/docs/doc/research-reports/briefs-stats-bulletins/summaryofanimalabuseliteraturefinal.pdf]

 

In Hinduism, on the other hand, every creature—even an ant—is sacred because believers see God in all of creation, as indeed everyone should, regardless of religious affiliation. Such reverence, demonstrated by nonviolence to animals as well as humans, is in sharp contrast to the manner in which many people in modern American and European society tend to treat their fellow inhabitants of the planet.

 

Consider snakes. It is obvious from popular culture that many, perhaps even a majority of, Americans greatly fear and despise these animals, and that they kill them on sight. This attitude surprised an Indian rheumatologist who treated my rheumatoid arthritis for a few years. Knowing that I was a nature writer, he wondered why Americans were so afraid of snakes. He told me how, in India, people revered these serpents because of the environmental role they play in helping to limit rodent numbers. And therein lies the crux of the matter.

 

In India, where people view wildlife as being of God, and where they comprehend the importance of wildlife to their own existence, they tend not to be afraid of nature. But, in America, most folks are so removed from the natural world that they usually hardly notice it, and they consider nature as possessing no, or very little, value to their lives.

 

Only when wildlife interferes with their existence do folks give it much thought, and then only to get it removed because they fear it, or find its presence inconvenient. Such views, of course, are only possible if one does not understand the natural world—or God.

 

Shri Ramakrishna, said to be India’s most influential religious reformer, spent his life (1836 to 1886) contemplating God. Having practiced the spiritual disciplines of many different religions, he concluded that all of them were true and led to the same goal of communion with the same God [emphasis mine]. He therefore saw all religions as harmonious, each providing us with representations of one truth, with the differences between religions being due simply to viewing the truth from a variety of perspectives.

 

The fact that the major religions of the world reached the identical conclusions—that there is but one God, and that nature is of great significance to human lives—furnishes the ultimate validation of my thesis that a true (accurate) knowledge of nature reveals that God exists.

 

Lastly, the people who best understand the natural world—because their survival depends upon it—are aboriginal groups living close to the land, as the American Indian once did. A sampling of quotes from Native Americans illustrates their belief in one god whom nature revealed.

 

Native American Wisdom

 

Edward S. Curtis, the photographer renowned for his twenty-volume magnum opus completed in 1930, The North American Indian, included text with his photographs that described folk stories, religious rites, tribal histories, and songs. In 1994, Running Press published a very small book (3.25 by 2.5 inches) called Native American Wisdom, with some of Curtis’ photos and text that quotes “statements of cultural value, beliefs, and attitudes from a number of Native Americans who lived and experienced tribal life in the years between the Civil War and 1930.”

 

The inside cover of my pre-owned copy of Native American Wisdom holds a birthday inscription from “Pop”, who wrote, “There is much wisdom in this little book.” And so, I found, there certainly is. Herewith, Native American quotes that fall right in line with the idea of one God whose existence is obvious by way of the natural world.

 

From Eagle Chief [Letakots-Lesa] who lived in the late 19th century and was a member of the Pawnee: In the beginning of all things, wisdom and knowledge were with the animals, for Tirawa [the Pawnee tribe’s “father” spirit], the One Above, did not speak directly to man. He sent certain animals to tell men that he showed himself through the beasts, and that from them, and from the stars and the sun and the moon should man learn…all things tell of Tirawa [emphasis mine].

 

From Brave Buffalo (late 19th century), a Teton Sioux medicine man: I have noticed in my life that all men have a liking for some special animal, tree, plant, or spot of earth. If men would pay more attention to these preferences and seek what is best to do in order to make themselves worthy of that toward which they are so attracted, they might have dreams which would purify their lives. Let a man decide upon his favorite animal and make a study of it, learning its innocent ways. Let him learn to understand its sounds and motions. The animals want to communicate with man, but Wakantanka [the “great spirit” of the Dakota Indian tribe] does not intend they shall do so directly—man must do the greater part in securing an understanding [emphasis mine]. NOTE: This comment especially struck a chord with me the moment I read it, as it describes exactly what led me to my nature revelation.

 

From Lone Man [Isna la-wica] (late 19th century) of the Teton Sioux—advice he received from a medicine man: If a man is to succeed on the hunt or on the warpath, he must not be governed by his inclination, but an understanding of the ways of animals and of his natural surroundings, gained through close observation. The earth is large, and on it live many animals. The earth is under the protection of something which at times becomes visible to the eye [as it did to me].

 

From Chased-by-Bears (1843-1915) of the Santee-Yanktonai Sioux: When a man does a piece of work which is admired by all we say that it is wonderful; but when we see the changes of day and night, the sun, the moon, and the stars in the sky, and the changing seasons upon the earth, with their ripening fruits, anyone must realize that it is the work of someone more powerful than man.

 

From Luther Standing Bear (1868?-1939), an Oglala Sioux chief: Out of the Indian approach to life came a great freedom—an intense and absorbing love of nature; a respect for life; enriching faith in a Supreme Power [emphasis mine]; and principles of truth, honesty, generosity, equity, and brotherhood as a guide to mundane relations.

 

From Gertrude Simmons Bonnin [Zitkala-Sa] (1876-1938) of the Dakota Sioux: … the voice of the Great Spirit is heard in the twittering of birds, the rippling of mighty waters, and the sweet breathing of flowers. If this is Paganism, then at present, at least, I am a Pagan.

 

From Big Thunder [Bedagi], a Wabanaki Algonquin who lived in the late 19th century: The Great Spirit is in all things; he is in the air we breathe. The Great Spirit is our Father, but the earth is our mother. She nourishes us; that which we put into the ground she returns to us…

 

From Mourning Dove [Christine Quintasket] (1888-1936), a member of the Salish: …everything on the earth has a purpose, every disease an herb to cure it, and every person a mission. This is the Indian theory of existence.

 

From Wooden Leg (late 19th century) of the Cheyenne: The old Indian teaching was that it is wrong to tear loose from its place on the earth anything that may be growing there. It may be cut off, but it should not be uprooted. The trees and the grass have spirits. Whatever one of such growths may be destroyed by some good Indian, his act is done in sadness and with a prayer for forgiveness because of his necessities…

 

From Luther Standing Bear (1868?-1939), an Oglala Sioux chief: I am going to venture that the man who sat on the ground in his tipi meditating on life and its meaning, accepting the kinship of all creatures, and acknowledging unity with the universe of things was infusing into his being the true essence of civilization [emphasis mine].

 

From Toohoohoolzote (mid-19th century), a Nez Perce chief: When I shot any kind of bird, when I killed, I saw that the life went out with its blood. This taught me for what purpose I am here. I came into this world to die. My body is only to hold a spirit life [emphasis mine; it’s how I felt when my mother died, which I’ve written about in the Epilogue].         

 

From Seattle [Seatlh] (1786-1866), a Suquamish chief: There is no death. Only a change of worlds.

 

From Chased-by-Bears (1843-1915) of the Santee-Yanktonai Sioux: It is the general belief of the Indians that after a man dies his spirit is somewhere on earth or in the sky, we do not know exactly where, but we are sure that his spirit still lives…So it is with Wakantanka [the “great spirit” of the Dakota Indian tribe]. We believe that he is everywhere, yet he is to us as the spirits of our friends, whose voices we cannot hear.

 

From Black Elk, a Wichasha [Holy Man] of the Oglala Lakota: We should understand that all things are the work of the Great Spirit. We should know the Great Spirit is within all things: the trees, the grasses, the rivers, the mountains, and the four-legged and winged peoples…When we understand all this deeply in our hearts, we will love and know the Great Spirit, and then we will be and act and live as the Great Spirit intends.


“Walk tall as the trees, live strong as the mountains, be gentle as the spring winds, keep the warmth of the summer sun in your heart and the Great Spirit will always be with you.” [Native American proverb]


TOMORROW, PART SIX: 

Chapter Four: The Final Evidence That God Exists


DISCLAIMER:

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 

Sunday, November 10, 2024

 PART FOUR


[First half published December 31, 2024, and second half published January 2, 2025, by The Daily Progress, the daily newspaper of Charlottesville, Virginia] 

 

[Published January 3, 2025, by The News Virginian, the daily newspaper of  Waynesboro, Virginia] 

Chapter Two: Observations of the Natural World Confirm the Existence of God

ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © 2024 Marlene A. Condon


The American Black Bear would much rather go after your birdseed than you. Contrary to popular belief, humans have no natural predators.


Although the Bible informs us that the proof of God’s existence is right before our eyes, many people—believers as well as non-believers—seem to be doubtful of this message. Believers often tend to regard as true that the existence of God is a matter of faith only. Non-believers simply do not consider whether proof exists because they have already reached a conclusion about the matter.

 

Other people claim that no one can prove or disprove the existence of God. They say there is no physical evidence we can use to verify His existence based upon our own observations or experience. They consider intellectual curiosity unwarranted because they deem the question unanswerable.

 

Then there are folks who feel that whether God exists makes no difference, so no one need bother asking the question in the first place. They feel whatever the answer turns out to be, it will not alter one’s life.

 

But if people were given undeniable proof that God does in fact exist, I am convinced that there would be a paradigm shift in people’s attitudes towards each other, the wildlife that shares this planet, and the physical environment that supports us.

 

How does having knowledge of nature make clear the existence of God? As explained in the Introduction, empirical evidence (based upon or verifiable by observation of the natural world) reveals a basic truth: All the organisms we study clearly exist to provide services that keep the environment functioning for the benefit (i.e., perpetuation) of nearby life forms.

 

However, there is one, and only one, organism that does not adhere to this truism: man. Mankind contributes absolutely nothing to the natural world. We exist simply to lead our lives; we do not pitch in one bit to help the environment sustain other life on Earth.


Man exists as a unique life form; he is not a part of nature. Science cannot explain such an evolutionary anomaly.  American astronomer Carl Sagan popularized the statement that, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”, and you now possess that extraordinary evidence.

 

People have long believed that English naturalist Charles Darwin’s idea of biological evolution by natural selection (as opposed to “artificial” selection, which refers to selective breeding controlled by humans) disproved the existence of God. Darwin believed that natural selection was a plausible explanation for how a wide variety of life forms could have developed over time from one common ancestor, which seems to contradict the Bible. Darwin, himself, came to doubt the existence of God “now that the law of natural selection has been discovered.” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Charles_Darwin]

 

And yet, Darwin’s theory supports the existence of God. He would have realized this truth if he had looked at the natural world from a broader perspective, rather than only looking at the survival capabilities of unique organisms within it.

 

Natural selection revolves around populations adapting, or becoming more well suited, to their environments as these surroundings change over time. Because Darwin focused only upon how the individual organism can better relate to its environment and itself survive, rather than going further and considering how the environment performs better due to the success of the individual’s adaptation, he missed the crucial point that the lives of organisms help maintain a properly functioning environment—which leads us directly to man’s aberrant place within it.

 

There can be only one explanation for such a deviation from the pathway of all other life forms. God must exist and He must have created mankind as a special entity—one that is not required to work for the benefit of all. Instead, man depends upon every other creature to work for his benefit as well as its own.

 

If man had simply evolved alongside other organisms, as scientists posit, why would his life role so completely depart from the established standard of every other organism upon the Earth? Evolution simply cannot explain such an incongruity. 


However, the Bible tells us that God gave man everything he needed in Eden so man could focus on worshipping Him. Man was, most assuredly, exceptional. There was no expectation that man would participate in activities that keep the environment working correctly—and he doesn’t.

 

This glaring peculiarity begs the question of how it could have ever been overlooked. However, it only becomes obvious to those who completely grasp how the natural world—in its entirety—works, and very few people truly look at this big picture. If they do, they consider it only in terms of their own existence, rather than in conjunction with other life forms. 

 

Of course, folks can always argue that irregularities happen, and that perhaps man’s odd status is simply due to a singularity in man’s evolution. But another peculiarity cinches the argument for the existence of God as the creator of man: All the large predatory animals that could easily rip people apart, if they wanted to do so, instead live in fear of mankind. It’s a fact that man has no natural predators, providing us with, perhaps, the most accurate meaning of God’s statement that man would have “dominion” over the Earth.

 

You may doubt that man has no natural predators. Nowadays, people are so removed from the natural world that they possess mistaken ideas about it. They tend to fear predators (even as small an animal as a fox), erroneously believing that animals which feed upon other animals would feed upon humans as well. However, historical sources confirm this isn’t so.

 

Lions, tigers, wolves, cougars, and bears, for example, have never readily preyed upon human beings, even though they could so effortlessly kill them for food. Throughout history, when given a choice, these predators preferred to move quickly and quietly away from people when their paths crossed.

 

Kevin Hanson, author of Cougar: The American Lion, tells us that American Indians respected the big cat’s hunting prowess, which apparently resulted in a way for them to get food without expending any effort themselves. After a cougar eats some of its meal, it caches the rest, and Native Americans took advantage of this trait to obtain meat more easily.

 

European immigrants, on the other hand, felt only fear and hatred for the animal—an attitude that is still very much prevalent in today’s descendants. That mindset is not surprising, considering that by the 1500s and 1600s, many of the people in Europe were already living in cities far removed from life in the natural world. Their lack of familiarity with predators undoubtedly resulted in fear of them, even though humans and such predators as wolves had already coexisted just fine for millennia.

 

However, the white settlers in America did not kill off cougars because the big cats went after them, but rather because these meat-eating animals sometimes went after their cattle. Likewise, in Africa, human/lion conflicts that had not formerly been a big issue are now threatening African lions with extinction.

 

Again, the problem is more about predation of livestock rather than of people, and its increase has much to do with modern herding methods. In the past, people conscientiously watched over their livestock, as mentioned in the Bible in Luke 2:8: “And in that region there were shepherds out in the field, keeping watch over their flock [of sheep] by night.” [The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version, The World Publishing Company, 1962.] Their simple presence served as a certain deterrent to livestock predators fearful of man.

 

Because the human population has grown so much—leaving limited space for lions and their prey—a starving lion may occasionally attack a human, adding to the desire to eliminate these animals altogether. But going after humans because of starvation is an act of sheer desperation. All animals need to eat and will take whatever they can get to quell hunger pangs, even if that happens to be a vulnerable human in the vicinity.

 

Starving people behave similarly. Although abhorrent to our sensibilities, some of the migrants in the snowbound Donner party (winter of 1846-47) were so desperate for food that they resorted to cannibalism. More recently, 16 survivors of a 1972 plane crash in the Andes also relied on cannibalism to survive the ordeal. Intense hunger is a stern and unapologetic driver of behavior.

[https://www.today.com/popculture/andes-uruguay-plane-crash-1972-survivors-now-rcna133498]

 

In America, native peoples may have domesticated the wolf (the wild ancestor of our dogs) because this species hung around their settlements looking for handouts. Another suggestion is that a reciprocal relationship existed in which both species provided food for each other or shared food. Either way, this canine allowed itself to become subservient to humans instead of asserting the power embodied in its size and fangs.

[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.2993/etbi-35-02-262-285.1]

 

If you are still skeptical and doubt that man has no natural predators, you need only to watch a circus act in which trainers demand unnatural behaviors from lions and tigers, such as making them jump through a hoop of fire. (Although circuses with animal acts no longer exist in the United States, videos are available for viewing on www.youtube.com) It is puzzling to see such big, muscular animals so intimidated by a man who couldn’t possibly defend himself against such brawny creatures, should they attack. Only the existence of God could possibly explain this seemingly nonsensical situation.

 

Of course, these captive big cats have, on occasion, killed their handlers, but not in a predator/prey relationship, but rather, in self-defense. The lifetime of stress they were made to endure (by being caged, frightened, and forced into abnormal behaviors) is antithetical to their biology (how they would be living their lives in the wild). As with humans, animals have their limits.  

 

Sometimes you hear about bears or cougars attacking people, but it’s usually the result of an adult inserting himself into a situation of his own making by allowing his dog to run loose. Coming upon a bear or cougar minding its own business, the dog will harass it by barking in too-close proximity, which forces the predator to defend itself from perceived harm. When the dog owner tries to save his dog, he gets injured by the bear or cougar, too.

 

Similarly, when people leave their small pets, babies, or toddlers unattended in bear/cougar country, they invite predators to take what appears to be an easy meal. These animals fear adult humans, but not their children or small pets that adults are expected to know should never be left unguarded in such circumstances.

 

Unfortunately, these incidents get misrepresented to the public, giving the predatory animals a bad rap they do not deserve, which results in people misunderstanding, fearing, and despising such animals. But when you look at the natural world with an open mind and see it as it truly is, rather than based upon personal feelings or opinions influenced by erroneous assumptions, you can clearly recognize the evidence of God’s existence, whether or not you are already a believer.

 

In the case of these large predators, evolution cannot explain their apprehension when encountering humans. In nature, larger size equates to greater strength and thus the ability to dictate in which direction a confrontation proceeds. Yet this intense fear of mankind took place long before people were empowered by guns and other such weaponry to fight off any kind of large-predator attack.

 

Human beings, unlike other organisms, possess no built-in defenses to protect themselves. Even our basic senses are poorly developed for thriving in the natural world; we don’t see or smell or hear as well as other creatures do to avoid dangerous confrontations—if such a situation presented itself. Thus, from a scientific standpoint, humans are so ill-suited to survive in the natural world that it’s nonsensical to posit they evolved in the same manner as other life forms and are in no way different from them.

 

This is not to say that mankind did not evolve through time. The fossil record makes clear that while Homo sapiens may be the only humans alive today, other hominins (species regarded as human, directly ancestral to humans, or very closely related to humans) preceded us by millions of years.

[https://www.britannica.com/science/human-evolution/Increasing-brain-size]

 

But to be human is to be far different from the other creatures. To survive, humans needed a larger brain that enabled them to think and eventually to communicate with others, so they could figure out such things as how to stay warm in cold climates and how to make tools that would help them catch prey and engage in agriculture.

 

It’s far more rational to recognize how this situation speaks to the existence of God, who created a world in which man had no need to defend himself. The natural behavior of all the large predators on Earth has always been to avoid, rather than to confront, man—if possible. Only the existence of God can explain man’s degree of non-physical dominion over all the other kinds of creatures on Earth.

 

In fact, the Bible confirms this statement. Genesis 9:2 states: “The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every bird of the air, upon everything that creeps on the ground and all the fish of the sea; into your hand they are delivered.” [The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version, The World Publishing Company, 1962.] Remarkably, but not surprisingly, everything I’ve learned on my own about the natural world is confirmed within the Bible.

 

A question often asked and answered is whether man is a part of nature or whether he is apart from it. Scientists argue via biological principles that man is a part of nature, while some politically minded folks say we are a part of nature only to justify our impacts upon the Earth, no matter how big or small.

 

In a paper published in 2017, John A. Vucetich, a professor of population ecology at the School of Forest Resources and Environmental Sciences at Michigan Technological University, concluded that common biological ancestry makes the animals and plants comprising nature our “siblings”, and thus we are “fundamentally one and the same.” He wrote that, “Ever since Darwin, common ancestry among living creatures is part of the bedrock of modern scientific thought.”

[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319355712_Are_Humans_and_Nature_Fundamentally_One_and_the_Same/citation/download]


Other people argue that man is a part of nature only to excuse his damage to the Earth. After all, if man is a part of nature, then anything he does is “natural” and therefore must be acceptable as natural processes.

 

Rachel Carson declared that, “Man is a part of nature, and his war against nature is inevitably a war against himself.” Of course, she meant that desecration of the Earth would result in the destruction of mankind because, just as with other organisms, people depend upon the natural world.

[https://www.azquotes.com/author/17642-Rachel_Carson#google_vignette]

 

Yet, man’s “war against nature” furnishes yet more evidence that he is, in truth, apart from it, rather than a part of it. No other organism works out of agreement with the world around it.


You can see this for yourself by taking an honest look at your neighborhood. How much of your local area looks natural? Probably not much, because people view “overgrown” (i.e., what should be seen as “natural”) areas as unkempt and unbefitting a civilized society. Therefore, they constantly mow or herbicide plants alongside roadways and in parks—even national ones—to do away with the natural look that is so supportive of wildlife.

 

At entrances to homes, “wild” areas are replaced with plants more to the owners’ liking that makes everything neat and orderly, resulting in a sanitized (read “does not support wildlife”) appearance.

 

By not living in harmony with nature, man is obviously a different “beast”—one that is biologically disjunct from all others. Therefore, he can’t possibly be part and parcel of the natural world.

 

You now have in your possession the incontrovertible evidence that God exists. Will it change your attitude towards our natural world and the way you live your life? Only you can decide.


Man’s refusal to live among large predators allows hoofed mammals, such as these White-tailed Deer, to overpopulate, causing problems not only for people’s gardens, but also for their environment.


TOMORROW, PART FIVE:

Chapter Three: Other Religions Agree with the Nature Revelation


DISCLAIMER:

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 

Friday, November 8, 2024


PART TWO

 

[Published December 24, 2024, by The Daily Progress, the daily newspaper of Charlottesville, Virginia]

[Published December 29, 2024, by The News Virginian, the daily newspaper of Waynesboro, Virginia]

Introduction: Importance of Nature to Human Existence

 ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © 2024 Marlene A. Condon 


Even the smallest and most delicate creatures serve important functions in the environment. The Aurora Damselfly shown here on a Common Violet leaf helps to limit insect populations (e.g., mosquito larvae) in ponds and still waterways when in its immature aquatic stage, and in the air when it’s an adult, thus helping to prevent overcrowding of such invertebrates in the environment. The damselfly is itself food for many other creatures, which limits its own numbers to sustainable levels.

 

We can understand the importance of nature to our own existence not only by scientific study, but also by reading the Bible. If the Bible truly represents a legitimate source of knowledge, it must concur with the reality of life on Earth, and it does.

 

Genesis tells us that plants were created first. This makes sense because, as we know from science, they would harness the energy from the Sun to pass on to animals. The plants would also create the oxygen-rich environment that most animals depend upon to live.

 

According to the Bible, a huge variety of creatures appears next. This agrees with scientific observations that each kind of animal has its own roles to play to help maintain the proper functioning of the environment. You need recyclers of organic matter (that is reused again and again) to create new life from those organisms that have died. You need predators to limit other kinds of critters, and seedeaters and (to a much lesser extent) herbivorous animals to keep plant numbers in check. In other words, every organism is essential for keeping the whole system running as it should.

 

Many people who are religious (as well as, of course, others who do not concern themselves with the natural world or God) don’t seem to comprehend that everything on Earth came into being in the order it did because the environment depends upon the interconnectedness among organisms to function. When people don’t grasp this underlying blueprint, they can’t see that the preservation of nature is vitally important to man’s continued residency on Earth.

 

Indeed, man appears last in the Bible because he is completely dependent upon all the other organisms (plants and animals) that work to make the Earth habitable for him. If you close your eyes to this truth about our relationship with the natural world, you cannot possibly notice the evidence that is, and always has been, right before our eyes, disclosing the remarkably simple and undeniable proof that a creator exists.

 

While most people feel they would need to witness a miracle to know that God is real, the truth is that we do not need an extraordinary event of epic proportions. Nor do we need to employ mathematical calculations or to talk about the majesty of nature. The substantiation of His presence has been right there in front of us, and the beauty of it is that you do not even need to be a person of faith to recognize its verity. Please read on to learn why nature, man, and God comprise the trinity for life—the bonds of which cannot be broken without suffering disastrous consequences. 


Large Milkweed Bug adults and nymphs reach the developing, and the mature, seeds of Common Milkweed by piercing the surface of a seedpod. By sucking juice from the seeds, the milkweed bugs kill them, and thus help to limit the number of viable seeds available to germinate the following year. In this manner, the milkweed population can be kept in check, but only in nature-friendly yards where people don’t kill insects they see on their plants.


TOMORROW, PART THREE: 

Chapter One: Bible Tells Us Man Is Dependent Upon Nature


DISCLAIMER:

Ads appearing at the end of e-mail blog-post notifications are posted by follow.it as recompense for granting free usage of their software at the author's blog site. The author of this blog has no say in what ads are posted and receives no monetary compensation other than the use of the software. 


  CONDON’S CORNER— Out of Touch with Reality © 2026 Marlene A. Condon All Rights Reserved     [Published October 8, 2026, by The Daily Progr...