CONDON'S CORNER

Everyone Should Have A Mimosa Tree

© Marlene A. Condon 2026 All Rights Reserved 

  [Published July 28, 2026, by The Daily Progress, the daily newspaper of Charlottesville, Virginia and published July 30, 2026, by The News Virginian, the daily newspaper of Waynesboro, Virginia.] 

After you drive by sprayed and now yellowed Mimosa trees around Charlottesville, you might want to contact the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors. Please let them know it’s not smart to destroy limited food sources for wildlife (bees, butterflies, moths, caterpillars, birds, and mammals) in developed areas where food is already in short supply, thanks to the human obsession with “neatness”.

Everyone Should Have a Mimosa Tree

On June 9, I happened to be on Hillsdale Drive in Albemarle County where I was extremely dismayed to see that most, if not all, of the Mimosa trees had been sprayed and were now yellow. Thanks to Governor Spanberger’s recent signing of four bills into law that will supposedly “work to prevent and manage the spread of invasive plants across the Commonwealth”, someone had apparently gotten right out there to spray poisons on Albemarle County property to kill these trees that are considered “invasive”.

 

[Note: I tried for weeks to find out from local government officials who had performed this task but was never provided an answer.]

 

https://www.29news.com/2026/04/12/four-bills-targeting-spread-invasive-plants-signed-into-virginia-law/

 

Lauren Taylor, executive director of Blue Ridge PRISM, claimed in this same news release that “people are recognizing the harms that these [invasive plants] are causing to our farms, to our parks, to our waterways, to our own backyards, and to the wildlife that we cherish”. However, the truth is more akin to these folks simply having a bad case of selective botanophobia, in which they believe alien plants are harmful or dangerous to our world.

 

https://worldlawyersforum.org/news/four-bills-targeting-spread-of-invasive-plants-signed-into-virginia-law/

 

Ms. Taylor went on to say that “Invasive plants are all around us and they are causing harm to the things that we love”, which refers to them “negatively impacting our children’s future and our grandchildren’s future — and removing invasive plants, controlling invasive plants is really key to our quality of life and the quality for people’s future.”

 

However, the truth is far different from this assessment, and everyone can see it for themselves. All you need to do is open your eyes to your environment to ascertain whether these plants are helping our wildlife to survive in the degraded areas where people have planted mainly lawn grass and a few shrubs or trees here and there.

 

If you truly care about our wildlife, I urge you to contact Blue Ridge Prism, Governor Spanberger, the Department of Conservation and Recreation, The Department of Wildlife Resources, and any organization spouting this misinformation regarding so-called “invasive” plants. [Contact information is provided at the end of the photo section below.]  Tell them plants seem “invasive” only because they can grow in the many degraded areas that people create in which native plants struggle to survive. 

Herewith a small sampling of the critters that could have been helped by those Mimosa trees that were sprayed with herbicides that are not only dangerous to the plants, but also to any insects, birds, or other critters that were on those trees when this action was taken.

 

Make no mistake about it, the destruction of those Mimosa trees—and many other such non-native plants—is literally an environmental crime against nature.

The day-flying Hummingbird Moth was much more common years ago than it is now, perhaps because of Mimosas being sprayed with pesticides that are poisonous to our insects.

 

A Spicebush Swallowtail butterfly obtains nectar at Mimosa blooms.

A long, healthy-looking caterpillar on a Mimosa lets you know it’s been feeding on this tree for some time and is doing well.

An inchworm (caterpillar) on a Mimosa illustrates the diversity of life that makes use of this non-native plant.

A Gray Squirrel grabs a Mimosa seed pod from which it can get the nourishment it requires to maintain health. 

An Eastern Tiger Swallowtail butterfly feeds itself at Mimosa blooms while providing beauty to the observer.

A female Northern Cardinal feeds upon Mimosa seeds in the author’s backyard.  

CONTACT INFORMATION:

 

Blue Ridge Partnership for Regional Invasive Species Management (PRISM), PO Box 119, White Hall, VA 22987

 

Governor Abigail Spanberger, Phone: 1-804-786-2211 Main address: P.O. Box 1475 Richmond, VA 23218

 

Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, 600 East Main Street, 24th floor,| Richmond, VA 23219-2094 | 804-786-6124

 

Virgina Department of Wildlife Resources, https://dwr.virginia.gov/contact/, Phone: 804-367-1000

 

CONDON’S CORNER

An Overdeveloped World Doesn’t Support Wildlife

 

© Marlene A. Condon 2026 All Rights Reserved 

  [Published July 9, 2026, by The Daily Progress, the daily newspaper of Charlottesville, Virginia and published July 11, 2026, by The News Virginian, the daily newspaper of Waynesboro, Virginia.] 

Black Knapweed (Centaurea nigra), a native plant in Europe, is one of the best plants for surviving drought conditions and also feeding insects, such as this Common Buckeye butterfly.  

“An Over-developed World Doesn’t Support Wildlife”

 

I’ve been an observer of the natural world for—literally—as long as I can remember. My very first memory is of walking along the city sidewalk with my older sister as she pushed a baby carriage containing our baby brother. As he is two and half years younger than I am, I know I must have been approaching the age of three as it was springtime—the time of my own birth—and my brother had been born at the end of the previous year. 

 

The city sidewalks were busy with large red-and-black ants going about their own lives as we went about ours. I possess many such memories of my earliest years of life as I seem to have been born with an avid interest in nature.

 

I’m now several decades beyond my youth and I have never lost my fascination with this aspect of life. Consequently, I possess thousands of photos I’ve taken of the natural world that attest to the attraction of nonnative plants to our wildlife. Thus, the push to rid our environment of alien plants is quite concerning to me.   

 

If our world wasn’t so developed (covered over with buildings and roadways) to accommodate humans, we wouldn’t have an abundance of alien plants populating human-disturbed areas (e.g., road margins where the nutritious and friable topsoil has long since been removed and poor subsoil left behind).

 

The reality is that the “intent” of nonnative plants is to keep the environment working as it should. Alien plants fare better in such areas (generally speaking) than native plants that have been here for millennia.

 

Native plants do best in the rich, built-up-over-centuries soil that preceded the arrival of Europeans and folks of many other nationalities, whereas many so-called invasive plants do well in the nutrient-poor soil left over from construction, roadside-grading, winter-salting of roads, highway department-mowing along roads, deposition of vehicle-exhaust chemicals, etc., etc.

 

Thus, we are lucky that humans transported—intentionally or not—alien plants to our land because we would instead have bare ground following development. Unlike the topsoil that is removed or despoiled by development, subsoil can support far fewer organisms (such as bacteria and earthworms), which is the reason it’s less fertile than the soil that would normally sit above it.

 

No matter what town you live in nowadays, you are bound to see development taking place to rob yet more land from the local critters. Consequently, the only way to help wildlife survive is to turn homeowners’ properties into nature-friendly gardens that can well support our local fauna. But do you see that happening? Not much.

 

Instead, you still see most homeowners mowing huge swaths of lawn that not only pollute the environment, but which also may serve only to support our overpopulation of deer—yet another current huge environmental problem. Consider that deer prefer to eat native plants (although they eat many nonnative plants as well) and you have to wonder why there isn’t a big hue-and-cry from native-plant enthusiasts for the government (i.e., the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources) to cut down the deer herd immediately to sustainable levels.

 

After all, how can anyone expect native plants to survive when we have a surplus of native deer to eat them? Yet the popular narrative continues to be that “invasive” plants are the biggest problem facing native plants, even though so-called invasive plants look invasive only because they fill areas cleared of native plants by mankind or deer.

 

This situation—in which the basic problem of too many deer is not addressed first—is very similar to what’s been happening in the Chesapeake Bay since the early 1960s. Throughout all of this time, our scientists have kept replanting native submerged grasses into a body of water that has, all along, remained hostile to the growth of these plants. The fact is that without first reducing the destructive consequences of sediment and nutrient pollution entering the Bay—thanks to what people are doing upstream—native grasses simply cannot possibly thrive there.

 

Likewise, the scientists’ answer to native-plant decline on land is also to tell folks to keep planting more native plants despite the untenable growing conditions of depleted soils, an overabundance of deer, and often, year after year now of drought or near-drought. One could say that a dearth of critical thinking appears to be ongoing in Virginia with no sign of this situation getting better anytime soon.

 

Consider that so-called invasive plants can be downright life-saving. They can survive not only our degraded physical environment, but also drought—both of which have become much more commonly occurring—while still feeding our wildlife. 2026 is the perfect time to be taking this truth into consideration.

“Leatherleaf Mahonia” (Mahonia bealei) is considered “invasive” in Albemarle and Augusta counties (among some other counties in Virginia), even though it’s not that commonly seen. Its flowers feed honeybees foraging in February when they may be the only blooms open, and its fruits feed birds (such as the female Northern Cardinal seen here) in late spring.    

I live in western Albemarle where we’ve received barely 50% of the amount of rain we should have received for the first five months of the year. The plants had continued to look good only because the weather had been on the cool side.

 

But now, as I write this article, we are experiencing hot summertime weather even though summer has not even officially begun and it’s already been 11 days with nary a drop of rain locally. Neither native plants nor animals do well under these conditions, the plants struggling to survive and unable to make fruits or seeds to feed wildlife.

 

On the other hand, nonnative plants often do fine under hot, overly dry conditions. My yard has many perennial Black Knapweed (Centaurea nigra) plants, the flowers of which feed numerous butterflies, bees, and insects of many kinds. Two Glossy Abelia (Abelia x grandiflora) shrubs do the same all summer along with my two Mimosa trees (Albizia julibrissin) that also attract Ruby-throated Hummingbirds.

 

I can’t stress enough that every yard should contain a mix of native and “invasive” plants to help our wildlife to survive. Current environmental conditions simply do not allow for environmental propaganda that is not based in fact.

 

The choice is yours to make. Choose unwisely and we lose many critters forever.