CONDON’S CORNER
An
Over-developed World Doesn’t Support Wildlife
© Marlene A. Condon 2026 All Rights Reserved
[Published July 9, 2026, by The Daily Progress, the daily newspaper of Charlottesville, Virginia and published July 11, 2026, by The News Virginian, the daily newspaper of Waynesboro, Virginia.]
| Black Knapweed (Centaurea nigra), a native plant in Europe, is one of the best plants for surviving drought conditions and also feeding insects, such as this Common Buckeye butterfly. |
I’ve
been an observer of the natural world for—literally—as long as I can remember.
My very first memory is of walking along the city sidewalk with my older sister
as she pushed a baby carriage containing our baby brother. As he is two and
half years younger than I am, I know I must have been approaching the age of
three as it was springtime—the time of my own birth—and my brother had been
born at the end of the previous year.
The
city sidewalks were busy with large red-and-black ants going about their own
lives as we went about ours. I possess many such memories of my earliest years
of life as I seem to have been born with an avid interest in nature.
I’m
now several decades beyond my youth and I have never lost my fascination with this
aspect of life. Consequently, I possess thousands of photos I’ve taken of the
natural world that attest to the attraction of nonnative plants to our
wildlife. Thus, the push to rid our environment of alien plants is quite
concerning to me.
If
our world wasn’t so developed (covered over with buildings and roadways) to
accommodate humans, we wouldn’t have an abundance of alien plants populating
human-disturbed areas (e.g., road margins where the nutritious and friable
topsoil has long since been removed and poor subsoil left behind).
The
reality is that the “intent” of nonnative plants is to keep the environment
working as it should. Alien plants fare better in such areas (generally
speaking) than native plants that have been here for millennia.
Native
plants do best in the rich, built-up-over-centuries soil that preceded the
arrival of Europeans and folks of many other nationalities, whereas many
so-called invasive plants do well in the nutrient-poor soil left over from
construction, roadside-grading, winter-salting of roads, highway
department-mowing along roads, deposition of vehicle-exhaust chemicals, etc.,
etc.
Thus,
we are lucky that humans transported—intentionally or not—alien plants to our
land because we would instead have bare ground following development. Unlike the
topsoil that is removed or despoiled by development, subsoil can support far
fewer organisms (such as bacteria and earthworms), which is the reason it’s
less fertile than the soil that would normally sit above it.
No
matter what town you live in nowadays, you are bound to see development taking
place to rob yet more land from the local critters. Consequently, the only way
to help wildlife survive is to turn homeowners’ properties into nature-friendly
gardens that can well support our local fauna. But do you see that happening?
Not much.
Instead,
you still see most homeowners mowing huge swaths of lawn that not only pollute
the environment, but which also may serve only to support our overpopulation of
deer—yet another current huge environmental problem. Consider that deer prefer
to eat native plants (although they eat many nonnative plants as well) and you
have to wonder why there isn’t a big hue-and-cry from native-plant enthusiasts for
the government (i.e., the Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources) to cut
down the deer herd immediately to sustainable levels.
After
all, how can anyone expect native plants to survive when we have a surplus of native
deer to eat them? Yet the popular narrative continues to be that “invasive”
plants are the biggest problem facing native plants, even though so-called
invasive plants look invasive only because they fill areas cleared of native
plants by mankind or deer.
This
situation—in which the basic problem of too many deer is not addressed first—is
very similar to what’s been happening in the Chesapeake Bay since the early
1960s. Throughout all of this time, our scientists have kept replanting native
submerged grasses into a body of water that has, all along, remained hostile to
the growth of these plants. The fact is that without first reducing the
destructive consequences of sediment and nutrient pollution entering the Bay—thanks
to what people are doing upstream—native grasses simply cannot possibly thrive
there.
Likewise,
the scientists’ answer to native-plant decline on land is also to tell folks to
keep planting more native plants despite the untenable growing conditions of
depleted soils, an overabundance of deer, and often, year after year now of drought
or near-drought. One could say that a dearth of critical thinking appears to be
ongoing in Virginia with no sign of this situation getting better anytime soon.
Consider
that so-called invasive plants can be downright life-saving. They can
survive not only our degraded physical environment, but also drought—both of
which have become much more commonly occurring—while still feeding our
wildlife. 2026 is the perfect time to be taking this truth into consideration.
I live in western Albemarle where we’ve received barely 50% of the amount of rain we should have received for the first five months of the year. The plants had continued to look good only because the weather had been on the cool side.
But
now, as I write this article, we are experiencing hot summertime weather even
though summer has not even officially begun and it’s already been 11 days with
nary a drop of rain locally. Neither native plants nor animals do well under
these conditions, the plants struggling to survive and unable to make fruits or
seeds to feed wildlife.
On
the other hand, nonnative plants often do fine under hot, overly dry conditions.
My yard has many perennial Black Knapweed (Centaurea nigra) plants,
the flowers of which feed numerous butterflies, bees, and insects of many kinds.
Two Glossy Abelia (Abelia x grandiflora) shrubs do the same all summer
along with my two Mimosa trees (Albizia julibrissin) that also attract
Ruby-throated Hummingbirds.
I
can’t stress enough that every yard should contain a mix of native and “invasive”
plants to help our wildlife to survive. Current environmental conditions simply
do not allow for environmental propaganda that is not based in fact.
The
choice is yours to make. Choose unwisely and we lose many critters forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment