Saturday, September 26, 2020

Roadside Stiltgrass


Roadside Stiltgrass

Highway departments help spread Japanese Stiltgrass by mowing in fall. Their mowers pick up and distribute seeds, creating miles of stiltgrass along roadway edges. 


ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © Marlene A. Condon


People tend to manage their properties without giving much thought to the detrimental effects of their actions upon the wildlife living there. Even folks who self-identity as environmentalists are often guilty of this lack of consideration for the creatures that share their world, although their actions may well be due to a lack of knowledge. Perhaps that situation can be remedied.

 

Consider the removal of so-called invasive plants. Much pressure is now applied to neighbors and friends by those who, in environmental-activist circles, believe it’s their duty to shame people they know into removing these plants by suggesting that such plants pose a great risk to the environment. But removal of these plants itself poses risks to wildlife that are never discussed; if it were, people who truly care about wildlife might build a wall of resistance to their friends’ or neighbors’ efforts to manipulate them into doing what they are told.

 

Recently, I noticed in the area where I live that a landowner had pesticided the Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) growing alongside the road of his property, along with some stiltgrass growing in a parking area. Employing pesticides is rarely a good idea, and in this case, the use of poison was completely unnecessary. The amount of stiltgrass to be removed covered a very limited space that could have easily been cut in ten minutes with a string trimmer shortly before the plants had bloomed.

 

Timing is everything. Stiltgrass is an annual that blooms in late summer (the end of August where I live), and cutting it at this time prevents seeds from forming that would be the source of plants next year. On the other hand, people removing stiltgrass alongside roadways where the species grows in abundance are wasting their time if they think their property won’t simply refill with these plants in the future.

 

The seeds from all the ignored roadside plants extending for miles in both directions will find their way there, courtesy of the highway department. It sends mowers out in fall along the local roads and the huge machines “catch” seeds, which then fall off farther along the road where they germinate the next year. People then blame the alien grass for “invading” when our highway department is to blame for the ever-increasing amount of ground covered by stiltgrass.

 

Personally, I don’t see this as a bad thing. White-throated Sparrows and Dark-eyed Juncos spend the cold months of the year in our Mid-Atlantic region of the East Coast, and the stiltgrass shelters and feeds these birds well during what can be a very harsh time of year. This consideration is important in a world where most people’s properties consist mainly of lawns kept overly short which don’t provide much for wildlife in any way.

 

Additionally, Japanese Stiltgrass, despite being nonnative, is a host plant for the Carolina Satyr, a brown butterfly with eyespots on its wings. Efforts to remove stiltgrass where this butterfly resides puts populations at risk because the plants may contain eggs.

 

NATURE ADVICE: 

Garlic Mustard (Allaria petiolata) and Princess Tree (Paulownia tomentosa) are two other common alien plants that people are pushed to remove from their roadside property. Garlic Mustard is usually pulled, while Paulownia is cut down and possibly pesticided later. Removal harms early pollinators that can use both plants for nectar and birds that feed upon Paulownia seeds during the winter. Additionally, the roots of Paulownia prevent soil erosion—an important consideration when it grows along a river, as it does where I live.

Friday, September 11, 2020

Correcting the Narrative

Correcting the Narrative



Fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) decorates a Washington (Olympic Peninsula) clearcut in this slide taken in the 1980s. A clearcut is hardly recognizable as such when it regrows, and it provides for a variety of wildlife dependent upon successional sites.


ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © Marlene A. Condon


 If you care about the natural world, you’ve probably depended upon conservation organizations for information because you believe them to be knowledgeable and trustworthy. But can you take what they tell you as gospel? Not necessarily.

 

In the 1980s-90s, the Sierra Club provided the narrative regarding clearcuts (areas of forest cut down for timber), telling us how bad they were for the environment. Few people, if any, would have doubted this perspective because, to human eyes, a clearcut appears as a site of total devastation.

 

However, forest regeneration provides habitat for wildlife, too—although not for all the original inhabitants. A variety of other kinds of critters depend upon such “disasters” to create open habitat they need for the perpetuation of their kind, as I discovered while birding clearcuts. I found many species of avian creatures, along with butterflies, rabbits, lizards, etc. My experience belied the Sierra Club stance.

 

A close birding friend of mine had also realized clearcuts provided for warblers and other species when the land next door to his house was completely logged. But while he didn’t hesitate to admit that fact to me, he would never have dared to breathe a word of it to anyone else. People tend to be terrified to go against the prevailing narrative, lest they be ostracized. No one wants to be banished from his social circles.

 

But signing on to a false narrative is not at all helpful to Mother Nature. You can’t possibly make the proper choices about how to take care of the natural world if you base your decisions upon falsehoods or misleading information. So, I wrote an article about the true value of clearcuts.

 

I originally sent it to major conservation organizations, thinking they would surely want people to know the truth. Not a one would publish it. Tellingly, the editor of  a national birding organization's magazine phoned to admit I was right, but this group believed it would lose members if my article appeared in their publication. The realization that environmental organizations were required by their members’ beliefs (wrong as they might be) to kowtow to an erroneous narrative was revelatory and very disturbing to me.

 

Does any birder really want Ruffed Grouse to disappear? As of 2015, 15 states listed the Ruffed Grouse as a Species of Greatest Conservation Need, mainly because of loss of habitat. This species requires the young forest that clearcutting helps to provide, yet birders apparently would have opposed receiving this information. Why? Psychologists explain this as "herd mentality", which minimizes social harm to individuals, but poses significant risks for our environment.

 

My article got published—first, by RGS, the magazine for the Ruffed Grouse Society (hunters), followed by Michigan Forests, the magazine of the Michigan Forest Association (foresters).

 

If you love our natural world as I do, I hope you will subscribe to this blog so you can be privy to real-world truths. Mother Nature desperately needs folks willing to fight inaccurate narratives that perpetuate faulty and ruinous information.

 

NATURE ADVICE:

Despite people’s aversion to clearcuts, they essentially replicate them when they clean their gardens in fall (known horticulturally as “putting the garden to bed”). Instead, you should leave the dried plant stalks, leaves, etc., until spring because this material is used by wildlife to protect eggs, larvae, and adult organisms from harsh winter weather.


UVa’s Forgotten Pond a Reminder We Should Protect Nature Lewis Mountain and the future Alumni Hall can be seen across University Pond in thi...