Where’s the Tolerance for Wildlife?
ALL TEXT AND PHOTOS © Marlene A. Condon
Hoo-boy. If you care about our
natural world, the last thing you should do is to read your neighborhood blog.
It’s terribly disturbing to see how intolerant of wildlife people tend to be.
Recently, one man asked about
advice for ridding his yard of an “invasion of chipmunks”. The replies brought
me great consternation.
I fully expected someone would
immediately tell him to get a cat, and it was, indeed, at the top of the list.
Despite years of public service announcements by the American Bird Conservancy to
inform people that cats kill huge numbers of birds (and many other kinds of
animals) every year, a great many folks still believe cats are “natural”
predators and useful for controlling “vermin”.
People don’t seem to understand
that cats are nonselective when it comes to killing prey. “Now numbering well
over 100 million in the United States, cats kill approximately 2.4 billion
birds every year in the U.S. alone, making cat predation by far the largest source of direct,
human-caused mortality to birds.”
https://abcbirds.org/program/cats-indoors/
People also don’t recognize
that “vermin” is a derogatory term that serves to implant a negative opinion in
the public psyche, which encourages the wanton killing of animals described as
such. It suggests that an animal is generally known as a “pest” (another
derogatory term) that is dangerous in some way to humans and has no redeeming values.
It’s a terrible way to view the organisms that, in fact, all exist to make the
Earth habitable for mankind.
In the case of chipmunks, these
mammals disperse seeds and thus help to replant forests and fields. They also
serve as food for a variety of other animals, such as foxes and hawks. The best
way to limit their numbers is by way of snakes, another kind of animal people
kill needlessly, as evidenced by remarks from social media:
“I hate snakes.” “Ugly beast”.
Regarding copperheads:
· “See y’all don’t get it. For us city slickers the first sight of this snake is not oh cool. It’s more like of F}+{#k.”
·
“Copperheads are vicious.”
·
“I’m a big gardener and am in
the woods daily. It’s one of my fears.”
·
“[W]e killed one last summer.”
·
“I smashed the copperheads [sic]
head with the blunt end of my rake to keep others safe. These copperheads are
aggressive as far as I know, no other snake has hissed at me aside from a
copperhead.”
·
“Very nasty snakes! They bite for any reason at all. We have lost two small dogs
to copperhead bites.”
·
“[Th]e shovel has been
accurate. They have 6 acres of woods in my yard to do their thing. They don’t
need to be by my pool to bite my dog (happened) or my grandkids.”
·
“Think we all got the point. Be
safe and observe your surroundings. Got to do what you have to do. Called
survival.”
·
“I killed them when I saw them.
With dogs, and kids and a wife, I did it for the safety of my family.”
Are copperheads venomous? Yes. Are they “vicious”, “aggressive”, or “very nasty”? Absolutely not. They do NOT “bite for any reason at all”. They try to protect themselves (by biting) only when seriously threatened and frightened, as any animal (including dogs and cats) or person would do.
Must you kill venomous snakes
for the sake of your dogs, kids, and wife? Not necessarily. If you have decided
to move to an area with such snakes, it’s smart to learn to be on the lookout
for them around your home. Children and adults alike should never walk around
without watching where they are stepping, and they need to remember to never,
ever stick their hands or feet where they cannot see if something is
there that could harm them.
Don’t think that’s a realistic
expectation? Surely you teach your children not to stick their fingers into
sockets (death by electrocution) and to look both ways before crossing the road
(death by vehicular impact)—both of which are far more likely occurrences when
kids are on their own than being injured or killed by a copperhead, especially
if brought to the hospital immediately for treatment. Of course, common sense
should dictate that very young children should never be outside all by
themselves.
When it comes to snakes (or wild
animals of any kind), you simply need to keep your distance to avoid being
injured, and this important truism should be taught to children. Pets, on the
other hand, cannot be taught to stay away from snakes; therefore, it’s your
responsibility to accompany them outside instead of letting them roam freely.
Snakes don’t chase after people or pets; they prefer to be left alone to go on their merry way and strike only when feeling threatened. So, be smart! Stay away from these reptiles and keep your pets and small children away, too.
Never take
advice from neighbors unless you know for a fact they are experts in the
subject.
For example, regarding
chipmunks, a person wrote that they “are very damaging. Many big holes all
over the Yard [sic]”. Chipmunks do not make holes all over the yard. This
person was probably seeing vole or shrew burrows. Chipmunks hide their burrows.
Another person suggested
people should call “Critter Control. They will catch and relocate them with Have-a-Heart
traps.” Not true. It’s illegal to relocate wildlife. If an animal control
service says it will relocate wildlife, the company is being dishonest. Any
animals trapped on your property are going to be killed, and perhaps not
humanely.
Lastly, the original
poster who asked about chipmunks said, “I can shoot them, right?” This person
lives in a suburban area and his only concern was that the animal was eating
his flowers. Imagine wanting to discharge a gun in a neighborhood where houses
are not that far apart and killing animals that are simply trying to survive.
Perhaps most disturbing of all, though, is that this man was undoubtedly
blaming the wrong critter for his woes. Chipmunks are not herbivorous; they do
not eat the greenery of growing plants or their blooms.
No comments:
Post a Comment